The Nyathi family, Gilbert and Joyce Nyamhanhindi, the social media content creators known for their “humble” online presence, have initiated legal proceedings against fellow content creator Louisa, accusing her of spreading falsehoods that have severely damaged their reputation. The move comes amidst a backdrop of recent controversies surrounding the couple, who have garnered a significant following on social media platforms.
The lawsuit, filed through their South Africa-based legal representatives, Mahuntsi Attorneys Incorporated, on January 10th, demands a retraction, an apology, and an immediate cessation of all defamatory statements made by Louisa. The legal action stems from Louisa’s appearance on DJ Ollah’s podcast on January 9th, where she made several damaging allegations regarding Gilbert’s fidelity and the family’s personal affairs.
Louisa, who had reportedly appeared to side with Mai Nyathi in a recent domestic dispute, now finds herself the target of the couple’s united front. According to the legal documents, Louisa allegedly used her social media platforms and her podcast appearance to disseminate false, defamatory, and malicious statements directed at the Nyathi family.
The specific allegations made by Louisa during the podcast included claims that Gilbert had been caught at a lodge after allegedly assaulting his wife in South Africa. She further asserted that Gilbert had taken R15,000 to Boksburg, where he booked a lodge with a girlfriend, using his wife’s phone number at the reception. Louisa claimed that Mai Nyathi subsequently went to the lodge and exposed the situation.
However, the Nyathi family vehemently denies these claims. The legal letter outlines the specific defamatory statements allegedly made by Louisa, stating, “These include but are not limited to statements alleging that: Our client (Mrs Nyathi) contracted a sexually transmitted infection (STI); and additional disparaging remarks and insinuations against our client’s parents, impugning their character, morality, and family standing.”
The lawyers representing the Nyathi family assert that these statements are “entirely false, unlawful, and have caused grave reputational harm, emotional distress, and public humiliation to our client and her family.”
The legal letter further states, “Your conduct constitutes serious violations of South African law (since you started these malicious innuendos in South Africa. In the event that you relocate to Zimbabwe, we shall instruct our correspondent attorneys to deal with the matter.”
The letter details the specific legal grounds for the lawsuit, including defamation, which is defined as “the unlawful publication of false statements that injure another’s reputation.” It also cites Crimen Injuria, “the unlawful and intentional impairment of the dignity or privacy of another person, recognized under common law.”
Furthermore, the legal team argues that Louisa’s actions violate Sections 10 and 14 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, which guarantee every individual’s right to dignity and privacy. They also cite Sections 14 and 69 of the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA), which prohibit the unauthorised processing and disclosure of private and sensitive personal information, including medical and family details, and Section 4(1) of the Protection from Harassment Act 17 of 2011, which criminalizes the repeated or harmful communication that causes distress, fear, or humiliation to others.
The lawyers have issued a series of demands to Louisa, requiring her to take immediate action to rectify the alleged damage caused by her statements. “Our instructions are that you withdraw all posts, recordings, interviews, and comments, whether online, in print, or otherwise, relating to our client, her parents, or her family,” the letter states.
In addition to the removal of all defamatory content, the lawyers demand that Louisa “publish a comprehensive written retraction and apology on the same platforms where the false statements appeared, clearly and publicly acknowledging that your allegations were false and are unreservedly withdrawn.”
The letter also demands that Louisa “cease and desist from making, posting, or repeating any further reference directly or indirectly to our client or her family in any form, including podcasts, interviews, or social media publications.”
Louisa has been granted a 72-hour window from the receipt of the letter to comply with these demands and provide written confirmation of full compliance. The lawyers have warned that failure to comply will result in immediate legal action, including the laying of criminal charges for crimen injuria, contraventions of POPIA, and harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act. The Nyathi family also intends to institute civil proceedings in a competent South African court for defamation, invasion of privacy, and emotional distress, seeking substantial damages, legal costs, and interdictory relief preventing further publication.
The lawsuit comes after Louisa allegedly claimed that Mai Nyathi had confided in her that she contracted a sexually transmitted infection from her husband, Gilbert, and had expressed concern about possible exposure to HIV. These claims have been particularly damaging to the Nyathi family’s reputation, given their carefully cultivated image as a respectable and loving couple.
In response to the allegations of infidelity and abuse that have circulated in recent weeks, the Nyathi family recently conducted a joint live broadcast, publicly dismissing the claims as fabrications. They asserted that a series of leaked voice notes, which purportedly contained evidence of Gilbert’s infidelity and abusive behaviour, were actually AI-generated creations by their “enemies” seeking to tarnish their image.
Follow @MyZimbabweNews
